Skip to content

With traditional lenders stepping back, we find ourselves in a unique moment reminiscent of Forrest Gump’s shrimping adventures—an expansive ocean of opportunity awaits. Commercial real estate (CRE) debt has emerged as a particularly attractive investment option, especially in comparison to CRE equity and investments in Business Development Companies (BDCs). This environment presents a rare opportunity for nimble investors to inject fresh capital into CRE debt, particularly as higher interest rates, limited capital availability, and looming maturity challenges create a compelling case. Expectations of rising defaults and delinquencies further underscore the potential of an asset class historically known for its resilience against inflation. Savvy investors should look beyond short-term market fluctuations and focus on the long-term advantages of CRE debt over equity and BDCs, as the true benefits are likely to unfold over the coming years rather than just a few quarters.

Where to invest? First, we believe debt > equity

Investors have a range of choices within commercial real estate (CRE), starting with the fundamental decision of debt versus equity. Is it better to buy properties or to lend money to property buyers? While CRE prices are significantly lower today than they were in 2022, suggesting that equities may be undervalued, we believe that the debt side presents a far more compelling opportunity at this time.

One of the primary advantages of CRE debt over CRE equity is the immediate cash flow it provides. This is particularly important in an environment where high interest rates significantly benefit lenders. Investors in CRE debt enjoy a steady stream of income from high interest payments, which are less dependent on fluctuations in the real estate market. In stark contrast, cash flows from CRE equity are heavily influenced by market performance and can be adversely affected by factors such as property vacancies, management inefficiencies, and fluctuating property values.

Moreover, CRE debt typically involves a lower loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, usually around 60% to 70%, compared to CRE equity, which often has effective LTVs of 100%. This lower LTV ratio signifies a reduced risk profile, as the debt is secured by the property at a value significantly less than its market price. This security feature provides stronger downside protection for investors, making CRE debt a safer investment, particularly in volatile market conditions.

Despite this lower risk profile, CRE debt investments have still delivered attractive returns.1 These returns are especially appealing given the current high borrowing costs, which can render CRE equity investments less profitable or even result in negative returns when leverage is employed. CRE debt’s ability to potentially offer substantial returns at lower risk makes it a compelling option for investors seeking a balanced risk/reward scenario.

Historically, CRE debt has served as an effective hedge against inflation. As inflation has risen, so have interest rates2, consequently increasing returns from CRE debt investments. This dynamic is not always true for CRE equity, where rising costs may erode profit margins and diminish overall returns.

CRE debt’s edge over BDCs

When comparing CRE debt to investments in BDCs, several factors make CRE debt more attractive. BDCs, which provide financing to mid-sized businesses, operate in a highly competitive market with numerous players vying for the same opportunities. This competition can lead to reduced returns and higher risks.

In contrast, the CRE debt market currently experiences significant dislocation, especially in sectors like the office market. This dislocation creates opportunities for investors to enter the market at discounted asset values, secure investments at low LTV ratios, and negotiate attractive terms. The less crowded nature of the CRE debt market, compared to the BDC space, offers a more favorable environment for investors looking to deploy capital efficiently and profitably.

Strategic market positioning

The current market conditions, characterized by high borrowing costs and economic uncertainty, have made CRE debt an even more attractive investment option. Equity investors, particularly those using leverage, face challenges in generating positive income, making debt investments more appealing. The strategic positioning of CRE debt in the market today allows investors to capitalize on these conditions, potentially securing high returns while managing risks effectively.

In conclusion, CRE debt offers several compelling advantages over CRE equity and BDCs, making it an attractive investment choice for those looking to balance returns with risk. Its ability to provide immediate cash flow, lower risk profile, attractive potential returns, effective inflation hedge, and favorable market positioning under current economic conditions makes CRE debt a standout option in the commercial real estate investment landscape. As the market continues to evolve, CRE debt remains a robust option for investors seeking stability and profitability in their investment portfolios. These advantages make CRE Debt a compelling investment option, especially for those looking to balance return potential with risk management in their investment portfolios.

CRE Debt’s Edge over CRE Equity and BDCs

Source: Benefit Street Partners.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.