Skip to content

Key takeaways

  • China’s strategic focus on biotech has resulted in research and development (R&D) investments and other policies that have helped build the infrastructure (labs, talent pipelines, and capital) for the sector to scale rapidly.
  • Biotech companies in China are advancing pipelines that include dozens, sometimes hundreds, of drug candidates through Phase 2 trials, then out-licensing them for late-stage development.
  • If the United States wants to maintain leadership in biotechnology, it must follow China’s example in supporting innovation, speed and efficiency.
     

Setting the stage

When I first visited China nearly two decades ago, the country’s pharmaceutical sector was in a very different place. It was small in scale, focused almost entirely on the domestic market, and dominated by generic drugs or medicines in-licensed from Western companies. Local firms had limited research capabilities, and global biotech investors barely considered China a serious player.

Fast forward to 2025, and the transformation is staggering. Biotechnology has become one of Beijing’s top strategic priorities, supported by major government initiatives like “Made in China 2025” and the “14th Five-Year Bioeconomy Plan.”

“Made in China 2025” was a sweeping industrial policy launched to reduce the country’s dependence on foreign technology and elevate domestic innovation. For biotech, this meant direct investment into R&D, generous tax incentives, subsidies for drug development, and the creation of high-tech industrial parks dedicated to life sciences. The policy helped lay the infrastructure (labs, talent pipelines, and capital) for China’s biotech sector to scale rapidly.

“The 14th Five-Year Bioeconomy Plan” built on that foundation by making biotech one of the “pillar industries” for national growth. It called for accelerated development in precision medicine, novel therapies, and next-generation manufacturing. It also encouraged faster regulatory approval timelines, improved intellectual property protections, and policies to attract and retain top global scientific talent.

Together, these programs have fueled an innovation ecosystem unlike anything China has ever seen—one that is reshaping the global competitive landscape.

This year, I traveled to Shanghai and met with more than 50 public and private biotechnology companies. As I explain this paper, what I found was an industry brimming with ambition, scale and speed, along with important implications for US and European biotech companies.

A market growing up

On the flight home from Shanghai, one thought kept coming back: Chinese biotech is growing up fast. The country now has a powerful R&D engine, an efficient clinical trial ecosystem, and a pipeline of molecules that matter for global health.

This certainly raises the level of competition in global biotech, but that competition can make the whole industry stronger. I expect investors to increasingly favor companies pursuing truly novel science, while leaving incremental “me-too” approaches behind, especially as Chinese firms can develop those cheaper and faster.

For patients, this means the potential for bigger breakthroughs. For investors, it means a market full of both risks and opportunities. And for policymakers, it is a wake-up call: if the United States wants to maintain leadership in biotechnology, it must follow China’s example in supporting innovation, speed and efficiency.



Important Legal Information

This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation and was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Any views expressed are the views of the fund manager as of the date of this document and do not constitute investment advice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. 

There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from the use of any information, opinion or estimate herein.

The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance.

Copyright© 2025 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. Registration Number (UEN) 199205211E.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.